Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 22(4): 1006-1021, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105849

RESUMEN

Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of titanium 2.0-mm curved locking strut plate and 2.0-mm straight locking miniplate with regard to their intraoperative use and the stability of fixation achieved both, clinically and radiographically. Materials and Methods: Forty patients with 62 sites of mandibular fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation were included in the study. The sample was divided into two groups of twenty patients each depending upon whether patient received three-dimensional 2.0-mm locking curved strut plate (group A) or 2.0-mm straight locking miniplates (group B). Mouth opening, teeth in the fracture line, degree of displacement, time taken, neurosensory and bite force evaluation were done preoperatively, 1st, 7th day, 2nd week, 4th week, 6th week and 12th week postoperatively. Results: Positive correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative bite force values at subsequent follow-up weeks. At 3rd month evaluation, the change in bite force from the previous follow-up visit was significantly greater in group A (locking strut plate) than group B (locking miniplate) in the incisor, left molar and right molar region. Statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding time taken (P < 0.016) depicting less time taken for placement of three-dimensional 2.0-mm locking curved strut plate(group A) 20.30 ± 4.85 min as compared to 27.30 ± 6.82 min for fixation with 2.0 mm straight locking miniplates in group B. Conclusion: The findings were suggestive that the both systems had better adaptation during fixation, comparable radiographic reduction and increased stability in postoperative period. However, 3D locking strut plate took relatively lesser operative time, offered good rigidity and better stabilization of fractured segments in three dimensions along with significant improvement in the masticatory bite force postoperatively.

2.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 22(3): 590-602, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37534344

RESUMEN

Purpose: The extraction of impacted mandibular third molar is associated with various types of intraoperative and postoperative complications, one of them is injury to lingual nerve. The present study aims to assess and correlate the variation in lingual cortical plate thickness with different angulations and determine the topographic relationship between the root apex of impacted mandibular third molar and lingual cortical plate using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 140 patients with impacted mandibular third molars who underwent preoperative CBCT imaging. The CBCT images were used to evaluate the outcome variables such as lingual cortical plate thickness and topographical relationship between root apex of impacted mandibular third molar and lingual cortical plate. The predictor variables included age, gender, inclination of third molar, mesiodistal angle, buccolingual angle and lingual plate morphology. Results: The temporary lingual nerve paresthesia was reported by 1 patient (0.71%) out of 140 patients. The lingual bone in distoangular and vertical impacted third molar was found to be 1.20 times thicker than mesioangular and horizontal teeth. Lingual bone thinning at mid-root level was observed in maximum number of cases with mesioangular teeth (68.5%), whereas horizontal impacted teeth showed lingual bone thinning (90.9%) at root apex level. The mean buccolingual angle of impacted mandibular third molar was found to be significantly associated with lingual bone perforation (p value = 0.0258). The morphology of lingual plate was observed as undercut type (37.14%) followed by slanted (36.43%), parallel (19.29%) and round type (7.14%). Conclusion: Increase in buccolingual angle of impacted mandibular third molar decreases lingual bone thickness which is the natural barrier for protecting injury to lingual nerve. Also undercut and slanted lingual plate shapes were recognised as risk factors for contact/perforation between root apex and lingual plate. Therefore, proper screening and planning of high risk patients before third molar extraction is crucial.

3.
Dent Traumatol ; 33(2): 126-132, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The decision as to whether teeth in the line of jaw fractures should be extracted or retained remains a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to assess the prognosis of teeth directly in the line of, and adjacent to, jaw fracture sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 50 patients with facial fractures in the dentate region, the diagnosis of which was made on the basis of clinical and radiographic examinations. A total of 124 teeth were present in 69 fracture sites (50 patients), of which 89 teeth were evaluated both, clinically (tooth mobility, pocket depth, pulp sensibility) and with periapical radiographs (degree of fracture displacement, marginal bone loss, root resorption). RESULTS: The results revealed that 61.9% of teeth in directly in the line of fractures showed no response to electric pulp testing compared with 48.9% teeth adjacent to fractures. The maximum frequency of non-responsive teeth was observed in Type I fractures followed by Type II fractures. Response to pulp tests was highly significant at postoperative 3- and 6-month periods (Wilcoxon's test). There was continuous reduction in the measurement for mean pocket depth at both test and control sites of teeth. The measurement of marginal bone levels of teeth in the line of fractures revealed a significant reduction (P < 0.01) from preoperative to postoperative 7-day period only. In teeth adjacent to fracture sites, the mean marginal bone levels of control site and test sites were not significant at any time interval. There was no difference in postoperative complications pertaining to whether the tooth at the fracture site was extracted or retained. CONCLUSIONS: Teeth in line of jaw fractures should not be removed on a prophylactic basis and should be followed up clinically and radiographically to determine any treatment needs.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilomandibulares/complicaciones , Extracción Dental , Traumatismos de los Dientes/etiología , Traumatismos de los Dientes/cirugía , Adulto , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Femenino , Humanos , Fracturas Maxilomandibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Pronóstico , Traumatismos de los Dientes/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
Indian J Dent Res ; 14(2): 81-5, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14705451

RESUMEN

A clinical evaluation is made in twenty patients with twenty seven mandibular fractures, managed with rigid internal compression plate and screw osteosynthesis. An analysis regarding complications of this method is made and discussed.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Adulto , Placas Óseas/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Humanos , Técnicas de Fijación de Maxilares , Maloclusión/etiología , Parestesia/etiología , Falla de Prótesis , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...